Advertisement

Measurement of clinical outcomes in pain medicine

      Abstract

      How we measure pain and patients’ responses to pain is key in developing both our understanding and treatment of it. This article outlines the application of tools for the measurement of clinical outcomes used in acute and chronic pain medicine; what makes a good outcome measurement and how this can be utilized in clinical and research practice is discussed. Various tools for outcome measurement are described including those which may be utilized in various patient groups.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Tousignant N.
        The rise and fall of the dolorimeter: pain, analgesics, and the management of subjectivity in mid-twentieth-century United States.
        J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2011; 66: 145-179
        • Beecher H.K.
        Experimental pharmacology and measurement of the subjective response.
        Science. 1952; 116: 157-162
        • Raja S.
        • Carr D.
        • Cohen M.
        • et al.
        The Revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises.
        Pain. 2020; 161: 1976-1982
        • Melzack R.
        • Casey K.
        Sensory, motivation, and central control determinants of pain: a new conceptual model.
        in: Kenshalo D.R. The Skin Senses. Thomas, Springfield IL1968: 423-443
        • Turk D.
        • Turk D.C.
        • Dworkin R.H.
        • et al.
        Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.
        Pain. 2003; 106: 337-345
        • Bennett M.L.
        • Smith B.H.
        • Torrance N.
        • et al.
        The S-LANNS Score “The S-LANSS score for identifying pain of predominantly neuropathic origin: Validation for use in clinical and postal research”.
        J Pain. 2005; 6: 149-158
        • Bouhassira D.
        • Attal N.
        • Alchaar H.
        • et al.
        Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4).
        Pain. 2005; 114: 29-36
        • Timmerman H.
        • Steegers M.
        • Hugen F.
        • et al.
        Investigating the validity of the DN4 in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain.
        PLoS One. 2017; 12e0187961
        • Galer B.S.
        • Jensen M.P.
        Neurology development and preliminary validation of a pain measure specific to neuropathic pain: the Neuropathic Pain Scale..
        Neurology. 1997; 48: 332-338
        • Wong–Baker FACES Foundation
        Welcome to the Wong-Baker FACES Foundation.
        2016
        https://wongbakerfaces.org
        Date accessed: November 8, 2021
        • International Association for the Study of Pain
        Resources/faces pain scale – revised.
        2021
        • Merkel S.I.
        • Voepel-Lewis T.
        • Sayevitz J.R.
        • et al.
        The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring post-operative pain in young children.
        Paediatric Nurses. 1997; 23: 293-297
        • Payen J.F.
        • Bru O.
        • Bosson J.L.
        • et al.
        Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale.
        Crit Care Med. 2001; 29: 2258-2263
        • Gélinas C.
        • Fillion L.
        • Puntilo K.
        • et al.
        Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients.
        Am J Crit Care. 2006; 15: 420-427
        • Abbey J.
        • Piller N.
        • De Bellis A.
        • et al.
        The Abbey pain scale: a 1-minute numerical indicator for people with end-stage dementia.
        Int J Palliat Nurs. 2004; 10: 6-13
        • Warden V.
        • Hurley A.
        • Volicer L.
        Development and psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003; 4: 9-15
        • Odhner M.
        • Wegman D.
        • Freeland N.
        • et al.
        Assessing pain control in nonverbal critically ill adults.
        Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2003; 22: 260-267
        • Roland M.O.
        • Morris R.W.
        A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain.
        Spine. 1983; 8: 141-144
        • Fairbank J.C.T.
        • Pynsent P.B.
        The Oswestry Disability Index.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 2940-2953
        • Beck A.T.
        • Steer R.A.
        • Brown G.K.
        Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II.
        Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX1996
      1. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale Revised https://cesd-r.com (accessed Jan 6, 2022).

        • Zigmond A.S.
        • Snaith R.P.
        The hospital anxiety and depression scale.
        Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67: 361-370
        • Sullivan M.J.
        The pain catastrophising scale.
        1995
        • Nicholas M.K.
        The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain in to account.
        Eur J Pain. 2007; 11: 153-163
      2. EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D about. https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/ (accessed October 26, 2021).

        • Doyle C.
        • Lennox L.
        • Bell D.
        A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness.
        BMJ Open. 2013; 3e001570

      Further reading

        • The British Pain Society and Faculty of Pain Medicine
        Outcome measures.
        2019